From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261317AbULWWe3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:34:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261319AbULWWe2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:34:28 -0500 Received: from fsmlabs.com ([168.103.115.128]:2275 "EHLO fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261315AbULWWeZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:34:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:34:13 -0700 (MST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Linus Torvalds cc: Paul Mackerras , Christoph Lameter , Andrew Morton , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Prezeroing V2 [0/3]: Why and When it works In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <41C20E3E.3070209@yahoo.com.au> <16843.13418.630413.64809@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Personally, at least for a desktop usage, I think that the load average > would work wonderfully well. I know my machines are often at basically > zero load, and then having low-latency zero-pages when I sit down sounds > like a good idea. Whether there is _enough_ free memory around for a > 5-second thing to work out well, I have no idea.. Isn't the basic premise very similar to the following paper; http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/osdi99/full_papers/dougan/dougan_html/dougan.html In fact i thought ppc32 did something akin to this.