From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261450AbVFUNXo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:23:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261460AbVFUNXQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:23:16 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:47531 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261450AbVFUNUw (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:20:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:20:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Pierre Ossman cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pointer cast warnings in scripts/ In-Reply-To: <42B80F40.8000609@drzeus.cx> Message-ID: References: <42B7F740.6000807@drzeus.cx> <42B80AF9.2060708@drzeus.cx> <42B80F40.8000609@drzeus.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Should I extract the changes for bkbits and make a reversed patch? No, go through the warnings, analyze each one and choose an appropriate solution. You might want to keep notes, which you can post with the changelogs, so one can reproduce, why a certain change was done. bye, Roman