From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262706AbVGMLzS (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:55:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262788AbVGMLzS (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:55:18 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:46804 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262706AbVGMLzR (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:55:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:54:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: randy_dunlap cc: Romain Lievin , lkml Subject: Re: dependency bug in gconfig? In-Reply-To: <20050712214647.447fdaf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Message-ID: References: <20050712214647.447fdaf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, randy_dunlap wrote: > This appears to be a dependency bug in gconfig to me. > > If I enable NETCONSOLE to y, NETPOLL becomes y. (OK) > If I then disable NETCONSOLE to n, NETPOLL remains y. > > If I enable NETCONSOLE to m, NETPOLL remains n. Why is that? > > config NETPOLL > def_bool NETCONSOLE > > Should this cause NETCONSOLE to track NETPOLL? It should (although it doesn't show it immediately). Did you compare the saved config files? bye, Roman