From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263275AbVGOLym (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:54:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263270AbVGOLxp (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:53:45 -0400 Received: from fsmlabs.com ([168.103.115.128]:48327 "EHLO fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263280AbVGOLxb (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:53:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 05:58:08 -0600 (MDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Andi Kleen cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: print processor number in show_regs In-Reply-To: <20050715134953.7f659467@basil.nowhere.org> Message-ID: References: <20050715134953.7f659467@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 05:04:57 -0600 (MDT) > Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > > void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > + printk("CPU %d:", smp_processor_id()); > > Isn't there a space after the : missing here? I don't believe so, there is a \n in the first line of __show_regs Zwane