From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262575AbVHDOvI (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:51:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262568AbVHDOs4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:48:56 -0400 Received: from silver.veritas.com ([143.127.12.111]:29112 "EHLO silver.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262575AbVHDOqu (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:46:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 15:48:35 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@goblin.wat.veritas.com To: Matti Aarnio cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anton Blanchard , cr@sap.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Getting rid of SHMMAX/SHMALL ? In-Reply-To: <20050804142040.GB22165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Message-ID: References: <20050804113941.GP8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804132338.GT8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804142040.GB22165@mea-ext.zmailer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2005 14:46:47.0873 (UTC) FILETIME=[574FDB10:01C59903] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > SHM resources are non-swappable, thus I would not by default > let user programs go and allocate very much SHM spaces at all. No, SHM resources are swappable. Hugh