From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262742AbVHDVmx (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:42:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262707AbVHDVkg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:40:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:10895 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262735AbVHDVii (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:38:38 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.95,168,1120460400"; d="scan'208"; a="300351852:sNHT16688364" Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 17:38:35 -0400 (EDT) From: James Lentini X-X-Sender: jlentini@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com To: Roland Dreier cc: openib-general@openib.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [openib-general] [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files In-Reply-To: <52iryla9r5.fsf@cisco.com> Message-ID: References: <52iryla9r5.fsf@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Roland Dreier wrote: > I would like to get people's reactions to moving the InfiniBand .h > files from their current location in drivers/infiniband/include/ to > include/linux/rdma/. If we agree that this is a good idea then I'll > push this change as soon as 2.6.14 starts. I think it is a good idea. > The advantages of doing this are: > > - The headers become more easily accessible to other parts of the > tree that might want to use IB support. For example, an NFS/RDMA > client probably wants to live under fs/ net/sunrpc/ has also been proposed.