From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932118AbVHSDfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:35:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932185AbVHSDfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:35:40 -0400 Received: from fsmlabs.com ([168.103.115.128]:50337 "EHLO fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932118AbVHSDfX (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:35:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:41:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Andrew Morton cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mobil Pentium 4 HT and the NMI In-Reply-To: <20050818202300.254410f4.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <1124416748.5186.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050818202300.254410f4.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if > > there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a > > Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the NMI won't be setup. Is > > there a reason that if the x86_model is greater than 0x3 it will return. > > Since my processor has a 0x4 x86_model, I upped it to that. Otherwise my > > laptop won't be able to use the NMI. > > > > Well I was hoping that someone with knowledge of the low-level Intel model > differences would pipe up, but they all seem to be in hiding. (Wildly > bcc's lots of x86 people). Looks ok to me, they haven't changed the performance counter setup on those processors. Acked-by: Zwane Mwaikambo