From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751095AbVHVUvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:51:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751096AbVHVUvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:51:16 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:17835 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095AbVHVUvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:51:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:47:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Chris Wright cc: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS In-Reply-To: <20050822173003.GS7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Message-ID: References: <20050822162050.GC9927@stusta.de> <20050822173003.GS7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > * Adrian Bunk (bunk@stusta.de) wrote: > > config SECURITY > > bool "Enable different security models" > > + depends on SYSFS > > Hmm, what about select instead? What's wrong with a normal dependency? Please don't abuse select, use it only if you really have to. bye, Roman