From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Handling spurious page fault for hugetlb region for 2.6.14-rc4-git5
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:17:36 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510200704290.2838@goblin.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1129772207.339.152.camel@akash.sc.intel.com>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Rohit Seth wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 16:53 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote:
> >
> > And I don't know what the right solution should be for this scenario at
> > this point for 2.6.14....may be to actually look at the HUGEPTE
> > corresponding to the hugetlb faulting address or don't allow mmaps to
> > grow the hugetlb file bigger (except the first mmap). I understand that
> > both of them don't sound too good...
>
> I would like to keep this patch. This at least takes care of bad things
> happening behind application's back by OS/HW. If the scenario that you
> mentioned happens then the application is knowingly doing unsupported
> things (at this point truncate is a broken operation on hugetlb). The
> application can be killed in this case.
>
> ...trying to avoid any heavy changes at this time for 2.6.14
I think your first suggestion, actually looking at the hugepte, is the
right one. I've dived into Adam's forthcoming hugetlb fault-on-demand
patch and extracted the minimum we need (but thought we might as well
take all the arguments to hugetlb_fault, even those not yet used).
This works fine so far as I can test it now, how about for you?
[Adam, if this goes in, your patch shouldn't need to touch memory.c or
hugetlb.h; and we hadn't noticed, yours was missing the hugetlb_fault
definition for the #else config, giving compile warning - fixed here.]
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 3 +++
mm/hugetlb.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 2.6.14-rc4-git7/include/linux/hugetlb.h 2005-10-11 12:07:52.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/linux/hugetlb.h 2005-10-20 06:27:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ int is_hugepage_mem_enough(size_t);
unsigned long hugetlb_total_pages(void);
struct page *alloc_huge_page(void);
void free_huge_page(struct page *);
+int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long address, int write_access);
extern unsigned long max_huge_pages;
extern const unsigned long hugetlb_zero, hugetlb_infinity;
@@ -99,6 +101,7 @@ static inline unsigned long hugetlb_tota
do { } while (0)
#define alloc_huge_page() ({ NULL; })
#define free_huge_page(p) ({ (void)(p); BUG(); })
+#define hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, addr, write) ({ BUG(); 0; })
#ifndef HPAGE_MASK
#define HPAGE_MASK 0 /* Keep the compiler happy */
--- 2.6.14-rc4-git7/mm/hugetlb.c 2005-10-11 12:07:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/hugetlb.c 2005-10-20 06:27:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -393,6 +393,28 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * On ia64 at least, it is possible to receive a hugetlb fault from a
+ * stale zero entry left in the TLB from earlier hardware prefetching.
+ * Low-level arch code should already have flushed the stale entry as
+ * part of its fault handling, but we do need to accept this minor fault
+ * and return successfully. Whereas the "normal" case is that this is
+ * an access to a hugetlb page which has been truncated off since mmap.
+ */
+int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long address, int write_access)
+{
+ int ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+ pte_t *pte;
+
+ spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+ pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, address);
+ if (pte && !pte_none(*pte))
+ ret = VM_FAULT_MINOR;
+ spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
int follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas,
unsigned long *position, int *length, int i)
--- 2.6.14-rc4-git7/mm/memory.c 2005-10-11 12:07:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/memory.c 2005-10-20 06:27:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ int __handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *
inc_page_state(pgfault);
if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
- return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; /* mapping truncation does this. */
+ return hugetlb_fault(mm, vma, address, write_access);
/*
* We need the page table lock to synchronize with kswapd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-20 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 21:15 Seth, Rohit
2005-10-18 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-18 22:17 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-19 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 3:25 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-19 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 14:33 ` Adam Litke
2005-10-19 15:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-19 19:05 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-19 20:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-19 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 20:28 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-19 23:53 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-20 1:36 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-20 1:37 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-20 6:17 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2005-10-19 15:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-19 18:47 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-19 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 21:59 ` Tony Luck
2005-10-20 0:05 ` Rohit Seth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0510200704290.2838@goblin.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®