From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751372AbVKCOmw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:42:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751426AbVKCOmw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:42:52 -0500 Received: from silver.veritas.com ([143.127.12.111]:7518 "EHLO silver.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751372AbVKCOmv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:42:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:41:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@goblin.wat.veritas.com To: Rob Landley cc: "Alexander E. Patrakov" , "Alexander E. Patrakov" , LKML Subject: Re: tmpfs (documentation?) bug In-Reply-To: <200511021658.57552.rob@landley.net> Message-ID: References: <436847DD.5050504@ums.usu.ru> <4368485C.3050505@linuxfromscratch.org> <200511021658.57552.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2005 14:42:51.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDD9F1C0:01C5E084] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Rob Landley wrote: > > So what's the new way to specify "this tmpfs mount should just be a directory > hierarchy with no data blocks" for those of us who _want_ the old behavior? Sorry about that. I guess you'll have to do the unaesthetic mount -t tmpfs -o nr_blocks=1 tmpfs /mountpoint echo full >/mountpoint/.full Hugh