From: Roy Keene <rkeene@psislidell.com>
To: bernd-schubert@gmx.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with 2.6 kernel and lots of I/O
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:00:46 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505311350330.7546@hammer.psislidell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505312040.30812.bernd-schubert@web.de>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed, Size: 1221 bytes --]
Bernd,
The ENBD project requires a kernel patch for 2.6 support and I
would like to remain with the vendor supplied (and "blessed" kernel) for
support reasons.
Since I cannot provide feedback on the latest version of the
kernel and I don't want to have an "unblessed" kernel, I've opened a
ticket with RedHat attached to my support contract for this problem. I
mainly posted my question here to see if this was a known issue with 2.6
in general or NBD-specific.
I had not heard of "DRBD" before now, but it looks interesting. I
am looking into it further.
Thanks,
Roy Keene
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Roy,
>
> Roy Keene wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a (well, at least one) show-stopping problems with the 2.6
>> kernel while doing heavy I/O. I have a (software) RAID1 of network block
>> devices (nbd0 and nbd1) set up on two identical machines in an
>
> what about using drbd or enbd? AFAIK both are much better tested/suited for
> network raid.
>
> Cheers,
> Bernd
>
>
> --
> Bernd Schubert
> PCI / Theoretische Chemie
> Universität Heidelberg
> INF 229
> 69120 Heidelberg
> e-mail: bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-31 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-31 15:55 Roy Keene
[not found] ` <200505312040.30812.bernd-schubert@web.de>
2005-05-31 19:00 ` Roy Keene [this message]
2005-06-01 1:16 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-01 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-05 10:11 ` Erik Slagter
2005-06-06 5:46 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-20 22:19 ` Roy Keene
2005-06-20 23:18 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-20 23:54 ` Roy Keene
2005-06-21 2:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-21 7:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-21 14:23 ` Roy Keene
2005-05-31 16:12 Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0505311350330.7546@hammer.psislidell.com \
--to=rkeene@psislidell.com \
--cc=bernd-schubert@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®