From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete HAVE_ARCH_GET_SIGNAL_TO_DELIVER?
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:56:26 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506121051360.29300@anakin> (raw)
Now m68k no longer sets HAVE_ARCH_GET_SIGNAL_TO_DELIVER, can it be removed
completely? Or may ARM26 still need it? Note that its usage was removed from
kernel/signal.c about 2 months ago.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
asm-arm26/signal.h | 3 ---
linux/signal.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.12-rc6/include/asm-arm26/signal.h 2005-05-07 09:50:54.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-m68k-2.6.12-rc6/include/asm-arm26/signal.h 2005-05-07 18:23:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -166,9 +166,6 @@ typedef struct sigaltstack {
#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
#define sigmask(sig) (1UL << ((sig) - 1))
-//FIXME!!!
-//#define HAVE_ARCH_GET_SIGNAL_TO_DELIVER
-
#endif
--- linux-2.6.12-rc6/include/linux/signal.h 2005-05-07 09:51:06.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-m68k-2.6.12-rc6/include/linux/signal.h 2005-05-07 11:01:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -231,10 +231,8 @@ extern int __group_send_sig_info(int, st
extern long do_sigpending(void __user *, unsigned long);
extern int sigprocmask(int, sigset_t *, sigset_t *);
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_GET_SIGNAL_TO_DELIVER
struct pt_regs;
extern int get_signal_to_deliver(siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *return_ka, struct pt_regs *regs, void *cookie);
-#endif
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-12 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-12 8:56 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2005-06-12 9:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0506121051360.29300@anakin \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®