From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261425AbVFNXrR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261426AbVFNXrR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:47:17 -0400 Received: from serv01.siteground.net ([70.85.91.68]:32475 "EHLO serv01.siteground.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261425AbVFNXrO (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:47:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:46:11 -0700 (PDT) From: christoph X-X-Sender: christoph@ScMPusgw To: Andrew Morton cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shai@scalex86.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move some variables into the "most_readonly" section?? In-Reply-To: <20050614162354.6aabe57e.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20050608131839.GP23831@wotan.suse.de> <20050614162354.6aabe57e.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - serv01.siteground.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - scalex86.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > I think readmostliness and alignment are mostly-unrelated concepts and > should have separate tag thingies. IOW, > __cacheline_aligned_mostly_readonly goes away and to handle things like the > cpu maps we do: Yup that makes the whole thing much more sane. Can we specify multiple attributes to a variable?