From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263262AbVFXTx5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263051AbVFXTxq (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:46 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:10965 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263262AbVFXTt0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:49:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Lee Revell cc: Jan Beulich , jmerkey , Clyde Griffin , "John W. Linville" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD) In-Reply-To: <1119641349.3290.39.camel@mindpipe> Message-ID: References: <20050624003515.GB28077@tuxdriver.com> <42BB510B.5080500@utah-nac.org> <42BBC297020000780001D4A5@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> <1119641349.3290.39.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 08:21 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > > While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately saw missing... > > Um, you guys developed your own kernel debugger without looking at KDB > first? How would you know you're not just reinventing the wheel? Isnt the name "Novell ..." already a giveway? This is some kind of corporate management artifact. Someone wants to do something good for the poor Linux community that has no debuggers available and they just got something from somewhere that is going nowhere (merger?). They are in the period clueing in to opensource. Just give them some time ..... Hint to Novell Management : You own SuSE who has provided KDB with their kernel for quite some time.