From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261427AbVFZCzy (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:55:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261445AbVFZCzx (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:55:53 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:15013 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261427AbVFZCzw (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:55:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:55:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Pavel Machek cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, raybry@engr.sgi.com, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix SMP brokenness for PF_FREEZE and make freezing usable for other purposes In-Reply-To: <20050626023053.GA2871@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: References: <20050625025122.GC22393@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20050626023053.GA2871@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Pavel Machek wrote: > > 4. Remove the argument that is no longer necessary from two function > > calls. > > Can you just keep the argument? Rename it to int unused or whatever, > but if you do it, it stays backwards-compatible (and smaller patch, > too). Why do you want to specify a parameter that is never used? It was quite confusing to me and I would think that such a parameter will also be confusing to others.