From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261412AbVF0Ruh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:50:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261407AbVF0Rtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:49:31 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:46977 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261399AbVF0Rt1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:49:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:49:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Andrew Morton cc: Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [rfc] lockless pagecache In-Reply-To: <20050627004624.53f0415e.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <42BF9CD1.2030102@yahoo.com.au> <20050627004624.53f0415e.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > First I'll put up some numbers to get you interested - of a 64-way Altix > > with 64 processes each read-faulting in their own 512MB part of a 32GB > > file that is preloaded in pagecache (with the proper NUMA memory > > allocation). > > I bet you can get a 5x to 10x reduction in ->tree_lock traffic by doing > 16-page faultahead. Could be working into the prefault patch.... Good idea.