From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261808AbVGJBGV (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:06:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261810AbVGJBGV (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:06:21 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:30670 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261808AbVGJBGU (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:06:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:06:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Andi Kleen cc: Bob Picco , linux-mm@kvack.org, manfred@colorfullife.com, alex.williamson@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Early kmalloc/kfree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20050708203807.GG27544@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > I think that is a really really bad idea. slab is already complex enough > and adding scary hacks like this will probably make it collapse > under its own weight at some point. Seconded. Maybe we can solve this by bringing the system up in a limited configuration and then discover additional capabilities during ACPI discovery and reconfigure.