From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263125AbVGOCAR (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:00:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263131AbVGOCAR (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:00:17 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:16601 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263125AbVGOCAP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:00:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:00:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: David Gibson cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: RFC: Hugepage COW In-Reply-To: <20050715011428.GC7750@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20050707055554.GC11246@localhost.localdomain> <20050715011428.GC7750@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, David Gibson wrote: > Well, the COW patch implements a fault handler, obviously. What > specifically where you thinking about? About a fault handler of course and about surrounding scalability issues. I worked on some hugepage related patches last fall. Have you had a look at the work of Ken, Ray and me on the subject?