From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261496AbVG1Tuv (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:50:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261561AbVG1Tuk (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:50:40 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:63466 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261496AbVG1TtW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:49:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Pavel Machek cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Alternative to TIF_FREEZE -> a notifier in the task_struct? In-Reply-To: <20050728193433.GA1856@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: References: <200507260340.j6Q3eoGh029135@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20050728074116.GF6529@elf.ucw.cz> <20050728193433.GA1856@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I guess I'd prefer if you left "refrigerator()" and "try_to_freeze()" > > > functions in; there are about 1000 drivers that know/use them, and > > > some patches are probably in the queue.... > > > > Yeah but then other uses also could benefit from that. > > Just don't rename try_to_freeze() to whatever... make it do whatever > you need, but don't change the name so that we don't have to fix it at > 1000 places... Ok. Patchset will follow soon.