From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261250AbVHAWtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:49:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261314AbVHAWtW (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:49:22 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:5248 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261250AbVHAWsn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:48:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:48:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Andrew Morton cc: Ingo Molnar , mort@sgi.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch] remove sys_set_zone_reclaim() In-Reply-To: <20050801102903.378da54f.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20050801113913.GA7000@elte.hu> <20050801102903.378da54f.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > (I'm still not sure what happened to the idea of adding a call to "clear > out this node+zone's pagecache now" rather than "set this noed+zone's > policy") Yes, We need the clear this zones page cache functionality. I am not sure what the Martin's reclaiming code brings us. Since these patches do not allow the clearing of the page cache, we will still have off node allocations.