From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263049AbVHEPAe (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:00:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263050AbVHEPAT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:00:19 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:23731 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263049AbVHEO6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:58:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:58:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Andi Kleen cc: Paul Jackson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: NUMA policy interface In-Reply-To: <20050805091630.GL8266@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20050804142942.GY8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804170803.GB8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804211445.GE8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804214132.GF8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804234025.GJ8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050805091630.GL8266@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > a clean way. It cannot even deliver the functionality it was designed to > > deliver (see BIND). > > That seems like a unfair description to me. While things are not > perfect they are definitely not as bad as you're trying to paint them. Sorry this went to far in the heat of the discussion. But the BIND functionality is truly not where its supposed to be.