From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" <shai@scalex86.org>,
nippung@calsoftinc.com
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for single threaded process at getrusage()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:20:20 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512211209300.2829@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051221182320.GA4514@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> Following patch avoids taking the global tasklist_lock when possible,
> if a process is single threaded during getrusage(). Any avoidance of
> tasklist_lock is good for NUMA boxes (and possibly for large SMPs). We found
> that this optimization reduces the runtime of a certain scientific application
> by half on a 16 cpu NUMA box.
>
> This optimization is similar to the sys_times tasklist_lock optimization.
The optimization of sys_times is only possible because the "current"
task is running and therefore guarantees that the thread will not be
exiting.
getrusage and k_getrusage can be called onother tasks than the currently
executing task and in those cases better take the tasklist lock because
the task may exit while getrusage runs.
See wait_noreap_copyout() in kernel/exit.c and
arch/mips/kernel/{sysirix,irixsig}.c for uses of getrusage where the
struct task_struct * != current.
Maybe you can deal with these and insure that getrusage is always called
for the current process? In that case the struct task_struct * parameter
needs to be dropped from getrusage and k_getrusage.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-21 18:23 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-21 20:20 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2005-12-21 21:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-21 21:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-21 21:35 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-23 23:15 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-24 0:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-24 5:34 Nippun Goel
2005-12-24 17:52 Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-27 20:21 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0512211209300.2829@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nippung@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®