From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261732AbVGETAc@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261732AbVGETAc (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:00:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261787AbVGETAc
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:00:32 -0400
Received: from lucidpixels.com ([66.45.37.187]:58090 "EHLO lucidpixels.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261732AbVGETA1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:00:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:00:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Kernel 2.6: P4 SMT Question.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507051459150.541@p34>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

General Question:

Would a desktop or server benefit more from SMT?

For a Pentium 4 w/HT, we use SMP.

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using SMT in the kernel?

Thanks,

Justin.