From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261758AbVGXBxC@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261758AbVGXBxC (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:53:02 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261828AbVGXBxC
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:53:02 -0400
Received: from wombat.indigo.net.au ([202.0.185.19]:3853 "EHLO
	wombat.indigo.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261758AbVGXBxB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:53:01 -0400
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:44:41 +0800 (WST)
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TGFzc2UgS8Okcmtrw6RpbmVuIC8gVHJvbmlj?= 
	<tronic@trn.iki.fi>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
       =?UTF-8?B?TGFzc2UgS8Okcmtrw6RpbmVuIC8gVHJvbmlj?= 
	<tronic+lzID=lx43caky45@trn.iki.fi>,
       ioGL64NX <iogl64nx@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Supermount
In-Reply-To: <42E27FCC.5050601@trn.iki.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507240943590.2284@donald.themaw.net>
References: <42E00DD3.9060407@trn.iki.fi> <2de37a440507211450501a8378@mail.gmail.com>
 <42E12105.3090900@trn.iki.fi> <200507231247.17034.oliver@neukum.org>
 <42E27FCC.5050601@trn.iki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1629620785-888797358-1122169481=:2284"
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-101.4, required 8,
	EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, RCVD_IN_ORBS,
	RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	USER_AGENT_PINE, USER_IN_WHITELIST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--1629620785-888797358-1122169481=:2284
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Lasse K=C3=A4rkk=C3=A4inen / Tronic wrote:

> > To mount on demand use autofs. Unmounting and dealing with media remova=
l
> > is the problem.
>=20
> Granted, that can get pretty close. However, having to use /auto/*
> instead of mounting directly where required often limits using it quite
> a bit. Thus, I don't see it as a real alternative.

What do you mean "/auto/*"?

Ian

--1629620785-888797358-1122169481=:2284--