From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, support@promise.com
Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
apiszcz@lucidpixels.com
Subject: Linux Kernel 2.6.13-rc7 (WORKS) (2.6.13, DRQ/System CRASH)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:37:31 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508311328230.1945@p34> (raw)
All,
I am trying to get everyone together on this to hopefully solve a serious
bug that I have seen on multiple machines with:
a) A Promise ATA/133 controller (ATA/100 works OK)
b) Kernel 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 (2.6.13-rc7 appears to be OK)
The drive is a Seagate 7200.8 400GB 7200RPM 8MB cache disk.
hde: ST3400832A, ATA DISK drive
With older kernels, if I *DO NOT ENABLE DMA* it does not crash.
If I *ENABLE DMA* then proceed to do anything with the disk, it will
FREEZE the box, no oops, etc, *FREEZE*.
hdparm -t /dev/hde
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/hde1
Will freeze the box.
-------
Linux Kernel 2.6.13 final experiences the same problems as 2.6.12.5.
I have e-mailed the list quite a few times with this issue, I am surprised
very few people run into it.
Here is the error in the logs:
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: DMA timeout retry
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: timeout waiting for DMA
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady
SeekComplete DataRequest }
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: drive not ready for command
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: ide2: reset: success
After this, the machine locks up with 2.6.13.
With 2.6.13-rc7, I have not seen this once.
Can anyone offer any insight to why this is happening? I have a few
machines with the ATA/133 controller and 400GB drives; therefore, I'd
prefer to fix the problem rather than hooking up older, ATA/100 drives,
just so I can run newer kernels...
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-31 17:37 Justin Piszcz [this message]
2005-08-31 18:09 ` Justin Piszcz
2005-09-05 7:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-05 12:29 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-05 17:23 ` Justin Piszcz
2005-09-05 7:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0508311328230.1945@p34 \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=support@promise.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®