mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, support@promise.com
Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	apiszcz@lucidpixels.com
Subject: Linux Kernel 2.6.13-rc7 (WORKS) (2.6.13, DRQ/System CRASH)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:37:31 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508311328230.1945@p34> (raw)

All,

I am trying to get everyone together on this to hopefully solve a serious 
bug that I have seen on multiple machines with:

a) A Promise ATA/133 controller (ATA/100 works OK)
b) Kernel 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 (2.6.13-rc7 appears to be OK)

The drive is a Seagate 7200.8 400GB 7200RPM 8MB cache disk.
hde: ST3400832A, ATA DISK drive

With older kernels, if I *DO NOT ENABLE DMA* it does not crash.
If I *ENABLE DMA* then proceed to do anything with the disk, it will 
FREEZE the box, no oops, etc, *FREEZE*.

hdparm -t /dev/hde
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/hde1

Will freeze the box.

-------

Linux Kernel 2.6.13 final experiences the same problems as 2.6.12.5.

I have e-mailed the list quite a few times with this issue, I am surprised 
very few people run into it.

Here is the error in the logs:

Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: DMA timeout retry
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: timeout waiting for DMA
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady
SeekComplete DataRequest }
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: drive not ready for command
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: hde: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
Aug 31 11:30:25 p34 kernel: ide2: reset: success

After this, the machine locks up with 2.6.13.

With 2.6.13-rc7, I have not seen this once.

Can anyone offer any insight to why this is happening? I have a few 
machines with the ATA/133 controller and 400GB drives; therefore, I'd 
prefer to fix the problem rather than hooking up older, ATA/100 drives, 
just so I can run newer kernels...

Thanks.



             reply	other threads:[~2005-08-31 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-31 17:37 Justin Piszcz [this message]
2005-08-31 18:09 ` Justin Piszcz
2005-09-05  7:26   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-05 12:29     ` Alan Cox
2005-09-05 17:23       ` Justin Piszcz
2005-09-05  7:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0508311328230.1945@p34 \
    --to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=apiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=support@promise.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®