From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030190AbVJEPy0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:54:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030193AbVJEPy0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:54:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:4550 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030190AbVJEPyZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:54:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:54:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@cuia.boston.redhat.com To: Marc Perkel cc: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel? In-Reply-To: <4342DC4D.8090908@perkel.com> Message-ID: References: <20051002204703.GG6290@lkcl.net> <4342DC4D.8090908@perkel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: > Marc Perkel > Linux Visionary The problem I have with most visionaries is that while they see lots of stuff, they never show anything to the rest of the world. Unless you can explain to other people why your idea makes sense, or unless you implement your idea, it won't happen. If the idea is good enough, either of explanation or implementation should be enough. Preaching, OTOH, does not convince people. -- All Rights Reversed