From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:31:59 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510051529280.23676@excalibur.intercode> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30441.1128530889@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, David Howells wrote:
> > Any reason why this is configurable?
>
> Well, I saw that the network stuff was. I can make it non-configurable.
>
> > Why wouldn't someone want this?
>
> Speed/latency? But I suppose that's not really a factor.
Yes, the networking is for performance, especially from when we used to
register Netfilter hooks from within LSM. I don't know of any distros
that enable LSM but disable networking so we should probably think about
removing that as well.
> What about the security ops for keys that I've made available? Does doing it
> that way seem reasonable?
Not sure yet, need to spend some time looking at this from an SELinux
point of view.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-05 16:28 David Howells
2005-10-05 16:44 ` [Keyrings] " James Morris
2005-10-05 16:48 ` David Howells
2005-10-05 19:31 ` James Morris [this message]
2005-10-05 18:40 ` serue
2005-10-05 21:10 ` [Keyrings] " Chris Wright
2005-10-06 8:03 ` James Morris
2005-10-06 10:54 ` David Howells
2005-10-06 15:04 ` James Morris
2005-10-06 15:18 ` David Howells
2005-10-06 16:02 ` James Morris
2005-10-07 8:50 ` David Howells
2005-10-07 18:36 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-06 17:58 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-07 9:10 ` David Howells
2005-10-07 12:59 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-10-07 18:51 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-06 8:38 ` James Morris
2005-10-06 10:30 ` David Howells
2005-10-06 23:10 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-07 9:57 ` David Howells
2005-10-07 19:36 ` Chris Wright
2005-10-06 11:06 ` David Howells
2005-10-06 14:25 ` James Morris
2005-10-06 15:11 ` David Howells
2005-10-06 16:14 ` James Morris
2005-10-07 9:03 ` David Howells
2005-10-07 14:05 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0510051529280.23676@excalibur.intercode \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome