From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030288AbWARSvL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:51:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030278AbWARSvL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:51:11 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([69.30.125.51]:31201 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030288AbWARSvK (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:51:10 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:51:04 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@localhost.localdomain To: Michael Tokarev cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Miller , Ulrich Drepper , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ... In-Reply-To: <43CE8B14.4020909@tls.msk.ru> Message-ID: References: <43CE8B14.4020909@tls.msk.ru> X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: CFAE 5BEE FD36 F65E E640 56FE 0974 BF23 270F 474E X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://www.xmailserver.org/davidel.asc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: >> >> The attached patch implements the pepoll_wait system call, that extend the >> event wait mechanism with the same logic ppoll and pselect do. The >> definition of pepoll_wait is: >> >> int pepoll_wait(int epfd, struct epoll_event *events, int maxevents, >> int timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask, size_t sigsetsize); > > How about epoll_pwait() instead? It looks more appropriate, for > my eyes anyway. (Just a name, nothing more) Thinking about it, it looks netter for me too. I'll change it if there are no other objections ... - Davide