From: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2 swsusp, suddenly increased uptime
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:24:20 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0708282122220.16484@er-systems.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708140035.24240.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2123 bytes --]
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 14 August 2007 00:12, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, 13 August 2007 23:31, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sunday, 12 August 2007 21:39, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > today I saw this (output from my suspend script):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -> woke up at Sun Aug 12 11:39:17 CEST 2007
> > > > > > -> uptime is
> > > > > > 11:39am up 8 days 0:41, 10 users, load average: 26.12, 6.35, 2.17
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then I did a software suspend. After waking up, I saw this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -> woke up at Sun Aug 12 14:41:56 CEST 2007
> > > > > > -> uptime is
> > > > > > 2:41pm up 44 days 9:11, 12 users, load average: 35.17, 9.17, 3.33
> > > >
> > > > I just want to add, I built 2.6.23-rc2 on Aug 4th and this happened on Aug
> > > > 12 and I suspend once a day. And the only thing which was odd was the
> > > > uptime, nothing else.
> > > >
> > > > I rebooted with 2.6.23-rc3 today, so the odd uptime is gone.
> > > > Should I try 8 suspend cycles or something to reproduce it again?
> > >
> > > Well, if you can, please try to do something like this.
> >
> > I tried 20 suspend cycles, but this time with
> > echo reboot > /sys/power/disk
> >
> > Nothing special happend.
> >
> > I could try with "echo shutdown" if this makes sense, tomorrow.
> > Just let me know.
>
> Please try "platform" (ie. the default). "shutdown" is very similar to
> "reboot", so I think it'll behave correctly.
I do not have platform. => cat /sys/power/disk
test testproc [shutdown] reboot
Now are 14 days gone and my uptime is 14 days.
Many suspend/resume cycles were made (is there any counter you could see
how many?).
I tried everything with 2.6.23-rc3 to reproduce this but I could not. I
will reboot in to 2.6.23-rc4 now.
Thomas
--
Thomas Vögtle email: thomas@voegtle-clan.de
----- http://www.voegtle-clan.de/thomas ------
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-28 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-12 19:39 Thomas Voegtle
2007-08-13 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-13 21:31 ` Thomas Voegtle
2007-08-13 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-13 22:12 ` Thomas Voegtle
2007-08-13 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-28 19:24 ` Thomas Voegtle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0708282122220.16484@er-systems.de \
--to=tv@lio96.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®