From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751084AbVJCPJm (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:09:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751087AbVJCPJm (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:09:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:15029 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751084AbVJCPJl (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:09:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:06:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Paul Jackson cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pete Zaitcev , Coywolf Qi Hunt , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document patch subject line better In-Reply-To: <20051003072910.14726.10100.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20051003072910.14726.10100.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Paul Jackson wrote: > > Improve explanation of the Subject line fields in > Documentation/SubmittingPatches Canonical Patch Format. Ironically, the patch you sent doesn't adhere to the very documentation you are updating ;) Hint: missing "---". Linus