From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] mutex subsystem, -V5
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:36:46 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512221134150.26663@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051222153717.GA6090@elte.hu>
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Changes since -V4:
>
> - removed __ARCH_WANT_XCHG_BASED_ATOMICS and implemented
> CONFIG_MUTEX_XCHG_ALGORITHM instead, based on comments from
> Christoph Hellwig.
>
> - updated ARM to use CONFIG_MUTEX_XCHG_ALGORITHM.
This is still not what I'd like to see, per my previous comments.
Do you have any strong reason for pursuing that route instead of going
with my suggested approach?
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-22 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-22 15:37 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-22 16:36 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2005-12-22 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-22 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-22 18:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-22 21:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-22 21:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-22 21:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-12-22 22:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-22 23:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-22 17:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0512221134150.26663@localhost.localdomain \
--to=nico@cam.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®