mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apiszcz@lucidpixels.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:32:14 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601162031220.2501@p34> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060117012319.GA22161@linuxace.com>

Also, some people mentioned tuning, I used 8192 as the w/r size it then 
took 15 seconds, with 65535 it took 28 seconds.

I wonder how much faster NFS over TCP would be, or if NFS in the kernel is 
the problem itself?

Will try later thanks.

FTP seems to be the winner for now:

<--- 226 8.927 seconds (measured here), 78.31 Mbytes per second
733045488 bytes transferred in 9 seconds (77.08M/s)


On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Phil Oester wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:07:02PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> I suppose I should try NFS with TCP, yes?
>
> Precisely.
>
> Phil
>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-17  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-17  1:07 Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17  1:23 ` Phil Oester
2006-01-17  1:32   ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2006-01-17 17:48     ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2006-01-17 18:11       ` Alan Cox
2006-01-17 18:24         ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 18:33           ` Alan Cox
2006-01-17 18:37           ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17 18:38             ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 18:53               ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17 18:55                 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 19:01                   ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17 19:03                     ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 20:39                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-17 20:45                       ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 22:07                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-17 22:13                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-17 23:19                             ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 23:39                               ` Lee Revell
2006-01-18  0:43                                 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17  9:50   ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 17:10     ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0601162031220.2501@p34 \
    --to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=apiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®