From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965677AbWCTQBf (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:01:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964855AbWCTQBe (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:01:34 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:29580 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965670AbWCTQBS (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:01:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:01:01 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Wu Fengguang cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] radixtree: look-aside cache In-Reply-To: <20060319023449.288540000@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20060319023413.305977000@localhost.localdomain> <20060319023449.288540000@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter Hmm... This signoff exists because you are using some bit of earlier patches by me? Typically the _node endings mean that one can specify a node number where to allocate memory. Wont partial lookups like this complicate further work on the radixtree? Could you get your speed optimizations into radixtree.c so that others can use it in the future?