From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751167AbWDJUVe (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:21:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751173AbWDJUVd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:21:33 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:13737 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbWDJUVd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:21:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:20:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Dave McCracken cc: Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management , Adam Litke , wli@holomorphy.com Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Shared Page Tables [0/2] In-Reply-To: <200ED4FEFEB8AA8427120DE7@[10.1.1.4]> Message-ID: References: <1144685588.570.35.camel@wildcat.int.mccr.org> <200ED4FEFEB8AA8427120DE7@[10.1.1.4]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Dave McCracken wrote: > The lock changes to hugetlb are only to support sharing of pmd pages when > they contain hugetlb pages. They just substitute the struct page lock for > the page_table_lock, and are only about 30 lines of code. Is this really > worth separating out? Ia64 does not use pmd pages for huge pages. It relies instead on a separate region. I wonder if this works on IA64.