From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751250AbWDQTbM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751257AbWDQTbM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:12 -0400 Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.4]:33511 "EHLO mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751234AbWDQTbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:31:08 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@d.namei To: "Serge E. Hallyn" cc: Stephen Smalley , casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fireflier-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks In-Reply-To: <20060417192634.GB18990@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20060417180231.71328.qmail@web36606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1145297742.8542.206.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417192634.GB18990@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Hopefully a new version of evm+slim+ima will be ready for distribution > soon. Why are you still trying to introduce yet another access control model into the kernel, when SELinux is already there? Last I recall on this issue, we asked if you could look at providing integrity measurement as a distinct API, and integrity control as either integrated with SELinux or a distinct component which SELinux could use. - James -- James Morris