From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932068AbWDQXue (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932069AbWDQXue (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:34 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:13232 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932068AbWDQXud (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:48:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Steven Rostedt cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai , Nick Piggin , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , Martin Mares , bjornw@axis.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, benedict.gaster@superh.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, Chris Zankel , Marc Gauthier , Joe Taylor , David Mosberger-Tang , rth@twiddle.net, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1145049535.1336.128.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4440855A.7040203@yahoo.com.au> <20060417220238.GD3945@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote: > So now we can focus on a better solution. Could you have a look at Kiran's work? Maybe one result of your work could be that the existing indirection for alloc_percpu could be avoided?