From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030277AbWD1GrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:47:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030278AbWD1GrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:47:11 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:6031 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030277AbWD1GrJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:47:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:46:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Shirley Ma cc: Pekka J Enberg , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz , open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, openib-general@openib.org, openib-general-bounces@openib.org Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: possible bug in kmem_cache related code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Shirley Ma wrote: > I hit a similar problem while calling kzalloc(). it happened on > linux-2.6.17-rc1 + ppc64. > > kernel BUG in __cache_alloc_node at mm/slab.c:2934! > which is > BUG_ON(slabp->inuse == cachep->num); More entries were added to a slab than allowed? This suggests a race on slabp->inuse.