From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751358AbWFBJ2h@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751358AbWFBJ2h (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:28:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751360AbWFBJ2h
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:28:37 -0400
Received: from lucidpixels.com ([66.45.37.187]:50058 "EHLO lucidpixels.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751358AbWFBJ2h (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:28:37 -0400
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux XFS Tuning & Linux I/O Scheduler
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606020527320.12421@p34>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello all,

So far I have been following:

http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1479435

For tuning XFS; are there any other parameters or methods of 
tuning/optimization that are available to the end user?

Furthermore, I was wondering if anyone has tested 
CFQ,Deadline,Anticipatory,noop with XFS which did they find the best?

Thanks,

Justin.