From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932152AbWFMPzr (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:55:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932156AbWFMPzr (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:55:47 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:51623 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932152AbWFMPzr (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:55:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:55:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Nick Piggin cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, Hugh Dickins , Con Kolivas , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: zoned vm counters: per zone counter functionality In-Reply-To: <448E4F05.9040804@yahoo.com.au> Message-ID: References: <20060612211244.20862.41106.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20060612211255.20862.39044.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <448E4F05.9040804@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Nick Piggin wrote: > Is there any point in using a more meaningful namespace prefix than NR_ > for the zone_stat_items? > > > > +enum zone_stat_item { > > + NR_STAT_ITEMS }; > > + How about NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS ?