From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932782AbWFWGJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:09:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932779AbWFWGJH (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:09:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:37595 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932782AbWFWGJF (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:09:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:08:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , David Howells , Christoph Lameter , Martin Bligh , Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: tracking shared dirty pages -v10 In-Reply-To: <1151019590.15744.144.camel@lappy> Message-ID: References: <20060619175243.24655.76005.sendpatchset@lappy> <20060619175253.24655.96323.sendpatchset@lappy> <1151019590.15744.144.camel@lappy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Preview of the goodness, > > I'll repost the whole thing tomorrow after I've updated the other > patches, esp. the msync one. I seem to be too tired to make any sense > out of that atm. Do people agree about this thing? If we want it in 2.6.18, we should merge this soon. I'd prefer to not leave something like this to be a last-minute thing before the merge window closes, and I get the feeling that we're getting to where this should just go in sooner rather than later. Comments? Hugh, does the last version address all your concerns? Linus