From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750715AbWGFTSh (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:18:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750749AbWGFTSh (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:18:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:25821 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbWGFTSg (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:18:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:18:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Manfred Spraul cc: Ulrich Drepper , Michael Kerrisk , mtk-lkml@gmx.net, rlove@rlove.org, roland@redhat.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, paire@ri.silicomp.fr, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.kerrisk@gmx.net Subject: Re: Strange Linux behaviour with blocking syscalls and stop signals+SIGCONT In-Reply-To: <44AD5E5C.6070703@colorfullife.com> Message-ID: References: <44A92DC8.9000401@gmx.net> <44AABB31.8060605@colorfullife.com> <20060706092328.320300@gmx.net> <44AD599D.70803@colorfullife.com> <44AD5CB6.7000607@redhat.com> <44AD5E5C.6070703@colorfullife.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > Is it necessary that the futex syscall ignores SA_RESTART? Very possibly. That was definitely the case for "select()" long ago. Linus