From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932463AbWGHAnG (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:43:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932464AbWGHAnG (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:43:06 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:31429 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932463AbWGHAnF (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:43:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:42:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Andi Kleen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Bligh , Christoph Hellwig , Marcelo Tosatti , Arjan van de Ven , Nick Piggin , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA In-Reply-To: <200607080220.39100.ak@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20060708000501.3829.25578.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20060708000527.3829.58852.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <200607080220.39100.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Andi Kleen wrote: > I don't think the savings from this are enough to bother > the user with such an obscure config option. The savings are not only from the code paths. The VM itself is cleaner and the balancing issues are not that troublesome anymore.