From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422672AbWGJP5J (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:57:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422673AbWGJP5I (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:57:08 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:37792 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422672AbWGJP5H (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:57:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@google.com, hch@infradead.org, marcelo@kvack.org, arjan@infradead.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] Add CONFIG_ZONE_DMA to all archesM In-Reply-To: <20060710095254.bad0084b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20060708000501.3829.25578.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20060708000506.3829.34340.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20060710095254.bad0084b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > How about configuring this by > > config ZONE_DMA > def_bool y > depends on GENERIC_ISA_DMA || ARCH_ZONE_DMA > > and set ARCH_ZONE_DMA for each arch ? Yes we do something like that in a later patch. What would be the advantage of having CONFIG_ARCH_ZONE_DMA instead of CONFIG_ZONE_DMA?