From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750704AbWGRP6D (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:58:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750799AbWGRP6C (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:58:02 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:20451 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750704AbWGRP6A (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:58:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:57:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: "Martin J. Bligh" cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list In-Reply-To: <44BCFA4D.9030300@mbligh.org> Message-ID: References: <1153167857.31891.78.camel@lappy> <1153224998.2041.15.camel@lappy> <44BCE86A.4030602@mbligh.org> <44BCFA4D.9030300@mbligh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Maybe we need a NR_UNSTABLE that includes pinned pages? > > The point of what we decided on Sunday was that we want to count the > pages that we KNOW are easy to free. So all of these should be > taken out of the count before we take it. Unmapped clean pages are easily freeable and do not have these issues. Could we just use that for now? Otherwise we have to add counters to the categories that we do not track for now and take them out of the count.