From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030191AbWGYU0Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:26:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932493AbWGYU0P (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:26:15 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:45725 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932489AbWGYU0O (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:26:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:25:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Rik van Riel cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list In-Reply-To: <44C518D6.3090606@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1153167857.31891.78.camel@lappy> <44C30E33.2090402@redhat.com> <44C518D6.3090606@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Rik van Riel wrote: > > I think there may be a way with less changes to the way the VM functions to > > get there: > > That approach probably has way too many state changes going > between the guest OS and the hypervisor... An increment of a VM counter causes a state change in the hypervisor?