From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030213AbWGYXDv (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:03:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030228AbWGYXDv (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:03:51 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:39353 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030213AbWGYXDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:03:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:03:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Rik van Riel cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list In-Reply-To: <44C68F0E.2050100@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1153167857.31891.78.camel@lappy> <44C30E33.2090402@redhat.com> <44C518D6.3090606@redhat.com> <44C68F0E.2050100@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Rik van Riel wrote: > > An increment of a VM counter causes a state change in the hypervisor? > > Christoph, please read more than the first 5 words in each > email before replying. Well, I read the whole thing before I replied and I could not figure this one out. Maybe I am too dumb to understand. Could you please explain yourself in more detail I am also not sure why I should be running a hypervisor in the first place and so I may not be up to date on the whole technology.