From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Avoid allocating during interleave from almost full nodes
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:28:31 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611031622540.16997@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061103143145.85a9c63f.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But in this application which you are proposing, any correlation with
> elapsed walltime is very slight. It's just the wrong baseline to use.
> What is the *sense* in it?
You just accepted Paul's use of a similar mechanism to void cached
zonelists. He has a one second timeout for the cache there it seems.
The sense is that memory on nodes may be freed and then we need to
allocate from those nodes again.
> Yes. And it is wrong to do so. Because a node may well have no "free"
> pages but plenty of completely stale ones which should be reclaimed.
But there may be other nodes that have more free pages. If we allocate
from those then we can avoid reclaim.
> Reclaim isn't expensive.
It is needlessly expensive if its done for an allocation that is not bound
to a specific node and there are other nodes with free pages. We may throw
out pages that we need later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-04 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-03 20:58 Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-03 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-03 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-04 0:28 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-11-04 0:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 16:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 20:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 20:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-06 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-06 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 1:26 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-04 1:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-04 10:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-06 16:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-08 10:21 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-08 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-08 17:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-08 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-11-08 17:21 ` Paul Jackson
2006-11-08 17:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-12-01 7:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-12-01 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-01 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 10:35 ` CTL_UNNUMBERED and killing sys_sysctl Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0611031622540.16997@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®