From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965629AbWKGR4R (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:56:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965326AbWKGR4R (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:56:17 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:47812 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932769AbWKGR4Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:56:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:55:54 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: "Siddha, Suresh B" cc: Ingo Molnar , akpm@osdl.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree In-Reply-To: <20061107093112.A3262@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <200611032205.kA3M5wmJ003178@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20061107073248.GB5148@elte.hu> <20061107093112.A3262@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > Christoph, DECLARE_TASKLET that you had atleast needs to be per cpu.. > Not sure if there are any other concerns. Nope. Tasklets scheduled and executed per cpu. These are the former bottom halves. See tasklet_schedule in kernel/softirq.c