From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030695AbWKORBk (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:01:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030709AbWKORBk (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:01:40 -0500 Received: from extu-mxob-2.symantec.com ([216.10.194.135]:55712 "EHLO extu-mxob-2.symantec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030695AbWKORBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:01:39 -0500 X-AuditID: d80ac287-a28e6bb000005d67-b1-455b47f08001 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:01:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@blonde.wat.veritas.com To: Jan Beulich cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: adjust pmd_bad() In-Reply-To: <455B3AF2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Message-ID: References: <455B3AF2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2006 17:01:36.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5C9CA80:01C708D7] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Jan Beulich wrote: > Make pmd_bad() symmetrical to pgd_bad() and pud_bad(). At once, > simplify them all. Symmetrical and simpler, yes, but you're weakening the pmd_bad() test: no longer requires that all those _KERNPG_TABLE bits be set. Wouldn't it be better to go the other way and strengthen pgd_bad, pud_bad? Hugh