From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937135AbWLFTDg (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:03:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937154AbWLFTDg (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:03:36 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:37071 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937135AbWLFTDf (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:03:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:02:24 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter To: David Howells cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it [try #2] In-Reply-To: <20061206175622.31077.96046.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20061206175622.31077.96046.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, David Howells wrote: > Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't otherwise support it. > This assuming that the arch doesn't have support SMP without providing its own > cmpxchg() implementation. > > Signed-Off-By: David Howells I cannot evaluate the ARM implementation but otherwise. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter